Way back in July, BurdaStyle.com made an announcement that they were working on a release of Burda magazine for the United States. For those of you that aren’t familiar, Burda is a sewing pattern magazine that originates in Germany but is translated to many languages and sold in about 90 countries around the world. A sewing pattern magazine looks kind of like a fashion magazine with spreads of styled photo shoots, but instead of displaying designer clothing the garments are made from patterns which are included in a sheet that you trace from.
Note: This is a really long post – if you want the quick summary, scroll to the end for a comparison table.
I LOVE pattern magazines because I think they tend to include a wider variety of garments with more interesting details. (Probably because many of them are published every month, while envelope patterns are only released every 3 months or so.) Also, I find the photo shoots more inspiring than Big 4 envelope patterns because they are sewn up in more stylish and RTW looking fabrics. I also find the fit with Burda patterns to be closer to RTW and MUCH more consistent than the Big 4. Previously the US hasn’t had any pattern magazines you could subscribe to locally – all the ones I receive are shipped from overseas, including the English translation of Burda I’ve been getting for the last 4 years. I was THRILLED when I heard Burda was going to be available on US newsstands because it meant that perhaps pattern magazines will finally catch on in the US.
In late October, the first edition of US Burda showed up on at my local JoAnn’s. I recognized immediately when flipping through it that I’d seen the patterns before, but I bought it anyways because I wanted to do a thorough comparison with my other issues of UK Burda. FYI, Burda is sold around the world and translated for different countries but the patterns are always the same, so I fully expected the patterns to be repeats of what I already had. Anyone who already subscribes to the UK edition should expect this. The thing that surprised me when I grabbed my stack of UK Burdas for comparison is that the patterns were originally published in fall/winter 2012, a full year ago. Not sure why they chose to use year old patterns instead of more recent ones from the last three months, but since I like these features better than anything in the last few issues of Burda, I’m not complaining. I’m just wondering if they plan to always be publishing a year behind.
Here’s a summary of the features they chose to include:
One thing I notice about these features is that they all are of a similar style – tailored clothing with clean lines and a few modern twists. The fabric choices vary between the features (neon/brights, ethnic prints, black and white, and shiny/sequin special occasion fabrics), but if you look at the design lines I’d say these are all clothes you’d find in the closet of the same person. If I flip through my issues of the UK Burda, there is more variety in the styles – I see retro inspired clothes, very feminine clothing with ruching and ruffles, bohemian styles, and so on… There are also occasionally men’s clothes, children’s clothes, and costumes. Now, the features they chose for the US Burda are exactly my style and some of my favorites from the last year, so I’m not complaining! I just want to point out that if those features aren’t your style, the International Burda typically has more variety. Who knows, maybe there will be more variety in the next issue.
What else is different between the US and UK editions of Burda? Well, the US edition has a little more content in between the pattern features. There are ads, tips and tricks from readers, features on beauty products and runway styles, and a two page article on how to use a serger. There are also some craft projects which you also see in the UK Burda, but I didn’t bother flipping through my old issues to see if they were published before. At least one of them looks familiar, but I’ve never made one of the craft projects so I don’t pay much attention. Usually they are more of a source of humor to me than inspiration…
The US edition is also a bit thicker and glue bound (instead of stapled like the UK version) and all of the pages are printed on a nice glossy paper, including the instruction pages. (In the UK edition, the photo pages are glossy, but the instruction pages are printed on newsprint). I like the physical feel of the US edition – it feels more like a proper magazine, and the glue binding gives you a spine with the issue number printed on it so it’s easy to find on a bookshelf. The glue binding also means that the pattern sheets are easier to rip out.
Speaking of pattern sheets… there are FOUR! (The International edition only has one, with a cut line to divide it into two if you’d like.) The pattern sheets are also much smaller, but this makes them easier to lay out on a table and work with. The US edition also has less pattern pieces crammed onto one page, so overall the US edition sheets look easier to work with. That’s great news for beginners! Take a look:
Fair warning… while perusing the comments on BurdaStyle.com about this issue, I see that they made several mistakes in calling out which lines to trace for which pattern. If you’re not familiar, the instructions will say something like “Red pattern line, sheet A1, Pattern pieces 1-5” and then you’ll get out the sheet labeled A1 in the corner and look for number “1” in red printed along the edges of the sheet, then trace your finger inward until you find a red line. If the line is actually blue instead of red (as one commenter complained about a pattern they were trying to trace), you will be really confused. Honestly, I can’t think of a WORSE way to confuse a newbie to Burda and turn them off of pattern tracing, so this was really disappointing to hear. The pattern sheet for the international version has all markings (e.g. “center back”) printed in 3-4 languages, so I’m guessing the same sheet is used for all languages and gets a little more proofreading, because I’ve never had this problem with the UK edition.
If you’re wondering why the pattern sheets are less crowded, here’s the catch… half of the patterns (20 out of 40 shown in the issue) are NOT on the pattern sheets, but available as a free download online.
I checked it out, and the downloads are basically a free pass to the downloads from past issues they generally sell for about $5.99 each. The download has the pattern pieces for just that pattern, and you print at home and tape them together. There is also a print at copy shop full size option if you’d prefer to pay a copy shop to avoid taping. In case you can’t tell from the gif, I hate taping downloadable patterns together! I’ll suffer through it if that’s the only way to buy a pattern, but tracing is SO much faster. Maybe they thought that making the traceable sheets more sparse would be less intimidating to newbies, but to me this defeats the purpose of buying the magazine if I still have to print the pattern I want at home. Trust me – if you have the right tools to trace a pattern, it’s about 10 times faster than taping.
Onto the instructions… I had my hopes up from comments like the one below that the instructions would be “more thorough, more detailed and easier to understand”:
So, I compared the instructions between the US and UK editions for the same pattern, jacket #102. At first glance, the US instructions look longer. The US edition included a nice little set of instructions on how to cover snaps with lining fabric – awesome! Then I started comparing the instructions word for word… For the most part, the steps are the same word for word, but the US edition has added a few steps including how to turn the notched collar and how to attach the lining which the UK edition did not include. This is great news for beginners who want more detailed instructions!
A few things I noticed were sadly missing from the US instructions… The UK instructions included “Recommended fabrics: Lightweight jacket fabrics with some body”, while the US edition only listed the fabric used in the garment in the photo shoot: “Materials: Lurex novelty fabric”. Wow, that is about as useful as saying “something shiny”. Hopefully they correct this oversight in the next issue! Also, the UK edition had exact yardage requirements for each size, while the US edition just says 2 1/8 yd for all sizes. Not sure why they removed that either.
This is getting really long-winded, so I’ll get to the point… here’s a breakdown of the differences between the two editions of the magazine:
|US||UK / International|
|Patterns Per Issue||40 (20 in the insert, 20 downloads)||40-50+ (Varies per issue) BUT some are variations on the same pattern (e.g. short/long hem)|
|Issues per Year||4||12|
|Cost per issue (with subscription)||$7.50||$7.50|
|Newstand Price||$14.99||Not Available|
|Pattern Sheets||4 small sheets with 20 traceable patterns||1 large sheet with all patterns|
|Downloadable Only Patterns||20 in each issue||None|
|Instructions||A little more detailed than the UK instructions, but mostly the same||UK translation of the German instructions|
Alright, here’s my final recommendation…
Get the US edition (available here or on newstands) if:
- You’re new to Burda and want to try out the fit
- You don’t need the huge volume of patterns the monthly UK edition supplies
- You want slightly more detailed instructions
- You don’t mind printing and taping patterns together
Get the UK edition (available through GLP) if:
- You want ALL the patterns
- You prefer tracing to printing and taping patterns
Personally, I’m going to stick with the UK edition through GLP for awhile longer, but I’m hopeful that being able to buy Burda in the US at JoAnn’s and such will make pattern magazines more popular with US sewers.